Johnson-Cook、修正的Zerilli-Armstrong及Arrhenius本构模型对奥氏体不锈钢流变应力的预测

    Flow Stress Prediction of Austenitic Stainless Steel Using Johnson-Cook, Modified Zerilli-Armstrong and Arrhenius-type Constitutive Models

    • 摘要: 研究了Johnson-Cook (JC)、修正的Zerilli-Armstrong (m-ZA)和应变补偿的Arrhenius型本构模型对304奥氏体不锈钢高温流变行为的表征能力。利用温度(1173~1473 K)、应变(0.1~0.8)和应变速率(0.01~10 s-1)等温热压缩试验的真应力-应变数据来计算3种本构模型的材料常数。通过比较预测结果的相关系数和平均绝对误差、描述变形行为的能力、涉及的材料常数的数量,评估了这3种模型的适用性。结果表明:JC模型无法很准确地描述304奥氏体不锈钢在上述热加工区域的流变行为;m-ZA模型的预测结果与试验数据吻合相对较好;应变补偿的Arrhenius型方程比修正的ZA模型需要更多的材料常数和更多的计算时间,但可以更准确地跟踪变形行为。

       

      Abstract: Characterization ability of Johnson-Cook(JC), modified Zerilli-Armstrong(m-ZA) and Arrhenius constitutive model based on strain compensation were compared and studied for the high temperature flow behavior of 304 austenitic stainless steel. The material constants of these constitutive models were calculated using experimental stress-strain data from thermal compression tests at temperature(1173-1473 K), strain(0.1-0.8) and strain rate(0.01-10 s-1). The applicability of the three models was evaluated by comparing the correlation coefficient, absolute average error of the predicted results, the ability to describe the deformation behavior, and the number of involved material constants. The results show that the JC model is not sufficient to describe the flow behavior of 304 austenitic stainless steel in the hot working area. The predicted results of modified Zerilli-Armstrong models are in good agreement with the experimental data. The Arrhenius type equation based on strain compensation requires more material constants and more calculation time than the modified ZA model, but it can track the deformation behavior more accurately.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回